Links on this page:
What
If – Notice: You do not change and I do not. You change and I will.
Your
Future – Changing Your Habits Can Make the You That You What You Want to Be
If
You Need an Explanation of the Rubric.
If
You Think I Cannot Prove What I Say
If I
Marked Discipline Specific Errors
What
Does the Comment about Yellow
(for History I) or about Search Words (for History II) Mean?
Why
Are Words in My Paper Highlighted in Pink
or Blue?
Why
Are Words in My Paper Underlined in Pink or Written in Blue?
Why
Do You Write a Letter Plus a Number Next to Lines of My Paper?
Why
Are My Words Underlined in Pink and Why
Is D4 Beside That Line?
Notice the Math of an incredibly good deal.
50 |
Points out of 50 for the Good Habits for Evidence instead
of 0 |
What do you do?—Notice the numbers for the errors I underlined
on the rubric and correctly mark them with an X on the form. Mark if you want
to do the response to another student’s peer review of your paper. (It’s for
points and your brain.) Best advice: See your work as others will see it. Check your paper out and compare side by side each thing
I marked with the sources and do it meticulously. ·
If you do not see why, come to my office hours bringing
your book and your paper and the source if you have a specific place in it. ·
If you think I am wrong, show me. I believe in evidence
and I am fine with correcting my error. Caution: if you do not return it, you get
nothing—a 0. |
20 |
Points out of 50 for the
content/analysis (Your number may be higher or lower.) |
|
20 |
Extra credit if you accurately
complete the form and you accurately and carefully do the peer review and
turn by your class due date and before the seating chart is complete |
Why?—I am trying to tell
you your reality about evidence but not destroy your grade. |
90 |
An A- out a 100 |
Why?—I am trying to tell
you your reality about evidence but not destroy your grade. |
A boss in a good job will notice bad reading and analysis. If you are good at your job, you will be asked to learn something new--and if you have bad habits for evidence, that is when your boss will know. Get good habits for evidence now. Click on this URL from Evidence Requirements for examples for each good habit:
Click here for the markings on your paper.
What If Your Situation |
But You Do ALL of the Above |
And You Do NOT Do ALL of the
Above |
If you turned in your print late to me (after the seating chart) |
No deduction |
- 10 from your paper |
If your paper exceeded the maximum of 1 page and your prof had to cut and tape or fight the Xerox for you to be able to participate and have a grade |
No deduction |
- 10 from your paper |
If you turned in your file late to Turnitin |
No deduction |
- 50 from your paper |
If you did not turn in your print to me |
The above PLUS you provide a print with 48 hours (Write your name and your class on the back.) Then no deduction |
- 75 from your paper |
If you did not turn in your file to Turnitin |
The above PLUS you email with 24 hours asking to be able to upload it and do that correctly within 24 hours Then no deduction |
- 75 from your paper |
Click here for the URL in Evidence Requirements for the tutorial. There are preventions for each habit.
https://www.softchalkcloud.com/lesson/serve/6THInBcJ4XmuMr/html
Click here for the URL in Evidence Requirements about the rubric. It is used for everything written.
Click here for the URL in Evidence Requirements for proof that side by side a prof can prove what she marks. The examples do not show up in the URL. Look for the side by side examples at the bottom of this folder.
http://www.cjbibus.com/Evidence_Quiz_2.htm
Click here for the URL in Evidence Requirements for explanations.
http://www.cjbibus.com/Evidence_Quiz_3_What_Is_Different_About_History_When_You_Read_and_Write.htm
People who ignored this help made their work a lot harder and their paper a lot weaker. Follow instructions. Tip for a Habit That Will Help You Keep Your Job or Avoid Trouble with the Law:
1. Read them over at the beginning of the assignment—like the 1st day. Ask then.
2. Read them over again before you start research. Mark them so you know the actions. (Explained in class.)
3. Read them over again before you start to plan your writing. Check your marks carefully.
4. Read them over again before you submit your print or your file. Actually check off that you did each action.
For History I, I highlighted in yellow the specific section of the primary about the question. You wrote on some other words.
For History II, I:
· Covered in the instructions how to use a search word (using Ctrl-F) to find a specific section of a primary. (FYI: With digital primaries I use search words to seek out meaning.)
· Listed in the description for each Primary were specific words that would take you directly to a specific section of the primary about the question
It means nothing negative. I read all papers at least 3 times. 2 of the times are when I highlight:
1. Anything you put in “” I highlighted with pink
2. Any citation I highlighted with blue
It means a problem. I used these colors this way:
·
If you had words that you should have put in “” I underlined
in pink
·
If you had a statement of fact that should have had citation, I wrote ( ) in blue and frequently wrote F3 or the word cite
between the ( F3 ) or
( cite ) because F3
is in the “F” Paper column of the rubric and F3 means:
3. Did not cite accurately and according to the directions.
My best ideas come from my students. I had a student say to me “you tell me what I am doing wrong the rubric” but you are “not telling me how to do this right.” I realized that I could stick in front of the error the # of the Good Habit that would prevent that problem.
If, for example, I write F3 beside a line of words in your paper that means:
· That is a serious enough error to cause an “F” letter grade
·
But, if you click on Good Habits for Evidence 3 in the tutorial at Evidence
Requirements, you can find habits—ways to work—that will prevent that serious
error that can cause an “F.”
(If you want more help than the Good Habits for Evidence tutorial, just ask. I
repeat that I am glad to invest in each one of you with a phone conference or a
face-to-face meeting)
D4 is in the “D” Paper column of the rubric and it means:
4. Plagiarized or did “half-copy” plagiarism (also called “patchwrite”).
The best thing to do is to click on Evidence Requirements and then scroll to the bottom to:
· This heading - Reference: Pages 744-747 The Bedford Handbook on the Chicago Manual of Style - the standard for history.
·
This file -
Hacker_page746_Half-CopyPlagiarism_explained_with_examples.pdf
At the top of 746, it states that “half-copy” plagiarism can be:
· “mixing the author’s words with your own without using quotations marks”
· “plugging your own synonyms [or what you think are synonyms] into the author’s sentence structure”
If you compare the words that you wrote in the paper and that I underlined in
pink with the words in the primary or textbook, you probably will see what I
mean easily. If you do not see it, then we can talk. If you use the words I
underlined in pink without quotation marks and if the expert has the source, they will call it plagiarism or at a
minimum dangerous carelessness.