Chart (also
called tables) help people understand systems and build on each other’s
knowledge.
This
webpage provides:
§
Seeing
Omitted Issues by Using Charts – An Example (with Thanks to those Participants)
§
Mock-Up of the Chart Based on the Issue of
Retention Discussed in the Breakout Session
§
Other Examples of How to Use the Charts
§
What Methods Does Dӧrner Offer to Help You
Work With Systems?
Charts let
people see the whole—including issues omitted from the original chart. For example, the
participants in the breakout session suggested adding several customers/issues
to the left column. With thanks to those
participants, those new items are in rows 4, 7, 8, 9, 10. (Click here
for a printable PDF of the chart below.)
Looking at Customer Service in
Varied Fields – A visual to help you answer this
question: “If students aren't the customers of the university, who are?” (More)
With color coding marked row
by row to help you avoid “‘similarity matching,’[1] that is, a tendency to respond to similarities more than to differences. |
Storefront
Retail |
Attorney in
Private Practice |
Local
Political Campaigns |
Product Development-Custom |
Corporate
Training |
Higher Education |
||
Hardware |
Software |
||||||
1. Customer as user? |
Shopper |
Varied clients |
Client: Candidate |
Operators, plant |
User/operator |
Employee |
Student |
a. Commitment by the user? |
a. Almost always |
a. Almost always |
a. Almost always |
a. Always |
a. Almost always |
a. Almost always |
a. Varies |
b. Preparation of the user? |
b. Almost always |
b. Occasionally |
b. If incumbent |
b. Always |
b. Almost always |
b. Almost always |
b. Varies |
c. User as part of product? |
c. If focus groups |
c. Always |
c. Always |
c. Often |
c. Almost always |
c. Almost always |
c. Almost always |
2. Customer as who pays? |
Shopper |
Client |
Client: Candidate |
Company |
Company |
Corporation |
Student, parents |
3. Customer who may help to pay the bill? |
Varies |
Taxpayers if type of case/relatives |
Donors |
Taxpayers if |
Taxpayers if |
Rarely |
Almost always taxpayers |
4. Customer as mandates for required action (funded or
not)? |
If larger business |
Varies |
Varies |
Varies |
Varies |
Varies |
Almost always |
5. Customer as creator of the product/service |
Business owner; vendors |
Rarely |
Consultant |
Manufacturer/ consultant |
Programmers – patents[2] |
In-house or vendor |
Almost always faculty[3] |
6. Customer as the field of knowledge behind the
product/service? |
Never |
For attorneys, the law—our first allegiance |
Rarely |
Rarely[4] |
Rarely |
Rarely |
For professors, almost always their disciplines |
7. Customer as support staff? |
Varies |
Varies |
Varies - may be volunteers |
Varies with industry |
Varies with industry |
Varies with industry |
Always, especially Student Services |
8. Customer as leaders/managers? |
If larger business |
Not applicable |
Rarely |
Managers |
Managers |
Managers |
Administrators |
9. Customer as a board? |
Rarely |
Not applicable |
Rarely |
If incorporated |
If incorporated |
If incorporated |
Board of Trustees |
10. Customer as mission statement? |
Rarely |
Rarely |
Rarely |
Varies |
Varies |
Varies |
Almost always |
11. Customer as the regulator (such as a certifier, accreditor,
or standards organization)? |
Regulators - If BBB member |
Texas Bar Association |
Regulators –Texas Ethics
Commission |
Manufacturer; regulators |
Technical or industry standards |
Never |
Accreditors; some regulators/industry standards as well |
12. Customer as the region? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. Need for qualified workers? |
a. Never |
a. Occasionally |
a. If client issue |
a. Never |
a. Never |
a. Never |
a. Often1 to
Always2 |
b. Need for good jobs? |
b. Never |
b. Occasionally |
b. If client issue |
b. Never |
b. Never |
b. Never |
b. Often1 to
Always2 |
c. Need for safe communities?
|
c .Never |
c. Occasionally |
c. If client issue |
c. Never |
c. Never |
c. Never |
c. Often1 to
Always2 |
d. Need for a solid tax base? |
d. Never |
d. Occasionally |
d. If client issue |
d. Never |
d. Never |
d. Never |
d. Always |
13. Customer as the nation’s economic competitiveness? |
Occasionally (Walmart
effect) |
Occasionally |
Almost always |
Never |
Never |
Never |
All
customers above |
14. Customer as the nation’s decision-making in a
republic? |
Never |
Occasionally |
Almost always |
Never |
Never |
Never |
All
customers above |
15.The product/service is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. For short-term use? |
a. Almost always |
a. Always |
a. Almost always |
a. Occasionally |
a. Rarely |
a. Almost always |
a. Occasionally |
b. For long-term use? |
b. Rarely |
b. Always |
b. Occasionally |
b. Always |
b. Almost always |
b. Rarely |
b. Almost always |
c. On-going but changing? |
c. Almost always |
c. On-going only |
c. If incumbent |
c. Rarely |
c. Almost always |
c. Rarely |
c. Almost always |
16. Measurement of the user as part of the product and of the
product/service is? |
Transparent, and the
shoppers got what they wanted |
Transparent, and it
has public records |
Transparent, and it
has constant media |
Transparent, and it
has constant metrics |
Intransparent, but it has metrics and an outage system |
Intransparent, but the company
got what it wanted |
Intransparent and in transition |
17. Rewards of success
go to? |
Business owner |
Both client and attorney |
Both client and
consultant |
Company |
Client, but varies with the
founder |
Corporation |
All customers
above |
18. Risks from failure go to? |
Depends on contract, liability |
Attorney: 20% Client: 80% |
Consultant: 20%; Client: 80% |
Depends on contract, liability |
Depends on contract, liability |
Corporation |
All customers
above[5] |
1 With colleges and universities often serving this
purpose 2 With community colleges
focusing on teaching, rather than research, and serving this purpose from their
beginning -
Copyright C. J.
Bibus, Ed.D. 2011 - Column data provided by P. Batres, L. Clark, and E. McLane
This
example shows a college that determined that it had a retention problem in
math. The college administration went to the math faculty and encouraged them
to come up with a solution. The faculty proposed a 4th hour of class
as a required math lab for this 3-hour class. Collaboration continued to solve
this problem; for example, administration dealt with the funding. Refine the
plan by using the chart to think through all the issues to see if it works for
all of the customers of higher education.
Click here for an example of using the chart in this way and here for the longer notes
you write on the second sheet.
Charts can
let people collaborate while thinking about all the parts of complex systems.
Some possible examples are:
Dörner provides many methods to help us understand and act
usefully with systems:
For
information or problems with this link, please email using the email address
below.
WCJC Department: |
History – Dr. Bibus |
Contact Information: |
281.239.1577 or bibusc@wcjc.edu |
Last Updated: |
2012 – 06/04 |
WCJC Home: |
[1] The term “similarity matching” is James T. Reason’s. The quotation itself is from page 95 of Dietrich Dörner’s The Logic of Failure: Why Things Go Wrong and What We Can Do to Make Them Right.
[2] With some programmers and engineers retaining patents
[3] With faculty in universities expected
to add to the discipline’s body of knowledge and faculty in community colleges expected
to maintain knowledge in the discipline and to find or create ways to help
diverse learners of their disciplines
[4] With engineers, especially in fields where safety is involved, expected not only to adhere to the discipline but also to ensure that its standards are met
[5] Although all customers above take the
risk from a failed system of education, the 1st customers to feel the result of
a failed system of K-12 education may be:
-
Business
seeking qualified workers
-
Higher
Education trying to fulfill its mission with students who are unprepared