What You Do with the History Changes Feedback AND How Grading Works with All Unit Essays

Caution: I have copied a resource for my distance learning students. I may have some leftover specifics for them. If you see distance learning issues, please tell me so I can fix it.

 

What’s on This Webpage:

Making Sure I Try to Be Clear about the Limits of What I Am Saying

Making Sure I Stress My Positive View Toward Each of You and Why I Use Extra Credit for This Assignment

What’s in the Form That I Will Attach to a Copy of Your Essay?

What Do You Do to Complete This (and Get the Extra Credit and Be Able to See the Unit 1 Essay Questions)?

If You Are Really Puzzled Because You Have QP Marked

If You Are Confused about What Words in the Author’s Textbook Require Quotation Marks in Your Writing

How Can You Prevent the Problems Identified by the Evidence Checklist?

Basic Information and Specific Information for This Course

What is the Goal for Writing in This Course? – Think about it as teaching some section of history to your smart cousin.

How Does Your Instructor Grade Your Writing?

What Is the Evidence Checklist and What Are Its 2-Letter Abbreviations for Feedback?

 

Click here to hear a voice explanation of the main points in next heading. – This is similar to what I say in class but the overview might help you.

Making Sure I Try to Be Clear about the Limits of What I Am Saying

I stress what works based on learning history. I stress what is necessary:

 

HOWEVER, if bosses or professors say to do the opposite, then do that for them. That is the right thing to do.

 

Click here to hear a voice explanation of how grading works and how this process works. – This is similar to what I say in class but the overview might help you.

Making Sure I Stress My Positive View Toward Each of You and Why I Use Extra Credit for This Assignment

  1. My goal is not to zap you, but to make sure you are forewarned so someone else does not zap you. 
  2. I look at these issues as accidental misunderstandings that you have. In my surveys of my students for the last 4 terms, over 50% of students had a misunderstanding of most of these things, including plagiarism and “half-copy” plagiarism but especially factual accuracy.
    I have no problems with your brains or your ethics!
    I am concerned you have a misunderstanding that can get you zapped in your future.
  3. As proof of my positive position toward you:

·         I record a real grade for your work on the Practice Essay (History Changes Essay).
Why? So you can tell the percentage you will make on the 50-point assignments (2 essays each at 25 points) if you keep working as you are. If you made a 4 on the 10-point Practice Essay (History Changes Essay) and did the same manner of working on the 50-point essays, you would get only 20 points (40% of 50).

·         If you do the instructions below, I record all of the extra credit I have promised. If you cannot tell what to do, talk to me. I am glad to help you.
Why? Because I do not think people should be zapped for having a misunderstanding. That is why you can get extra credit to cover any low grade.

·         If you change how you work in the future, you will not only learn history a lot better (my goal for all this), but practice skills to help you for your entire life. Practice being the person you want to be.

What’s in the Form That I Will Attach to a Copy of Your Essay?

The form is my feedback to you, with Xs marked and comments added to show you the feedback.

 

I have marked this with a common example of someone with interrelated bad habits (with blue highlights). Habits (or how you work) are what gets you in trouble—being smart is never enough. I have also placed links in the example so you can go to more information if you want to.

 

Keep in mind I know I can be wrong. If you can show me where the source supports something, I am fine.

 

My feedback to you, with Xs marked and comments added to show you the feedback

These are the 5 items in the Evidence Checklist. If I placed an X below the item, you had this problem and you need to look at the instructions in the link and then do that IN the copy of your work below.

NS = Fact is Not from an approved Source (Not  from any other source—including your own memory)

QP = Quotation includes Plagiarized text

QC = Quotation is Changed from the  source OR you used it for another meaning than the author’s

NT = Fact is Not True. It is not verifiable using the probable page in the source.

W? = Where is the specific page where this is supported in our textbook?

 

X – Compare side by side and you’ll see all the words you are grabbing.

 

X – Compare side and by side and you will see them. If you do not, ask me. Glad to help you.

 

 

These are general problems. If I placed an X to the left of the item, you seem to have these problems.

X

Not meant to teach your smart cousin (Click here to see the goal in the syllabus. If you try to teach something, you will learn it.)

 

Vague

X

Stretching the truth in the source—perhaps to make something interesting

X

Reading passively

 

Not right reading for this question OR not enough of it (You read only ______________)

FYI: I list each of the correct readings for each question.

 

Not right question – did not answer the question asked

 

Other:

What Do You Do to Complete This (and Get the Extra Credit and Be Able to See the Unit 1 Essay Questions)?

You are not rewriting, not modifying anything, and not creating a new version of this assignment.

 

So what are you to do?

In this order, do this:

  1. Put your book and what you wrote side by side so you can compare them easily. I have found touching the words on each one very helpful in making myself observe carefully.

  2. If you have a QP marked (and many of you do), underline every word and every part of a word that you used from the book.

Example:

If the author wrote the word demonstrating and if you wrote demonstrated, then you underline demonstrated

 

  1. If you have an NS, NT or W? marked, compare carefully the page(s) you were supposed to read with what you wrote:

·         If the textbook does not specifically support what you say, then strike through those words. (Strike through looks like this.)

·         If you think that those pages you were supposed to read do specifically support what you say and that you could tell me a specific place on a specific page where the textbook does back that up, then leave it alone.

·         Do, however, be prepared to show me exactly the page number and exactly where it is on the page.

 

  1.  If you have a QC marked (something that is comparatively rare), it means that you have placed some words of the author’s within quotations marks, but you have:

·         EITHER modified the quotation without following the rules in The Bedford Handbook to reveal your changes to a reader

·         AND/OR used the author’s words for another purpose than he or she intended

 

So what do you do? You go compare letter-by-letter the author’s words and yours:

·         IF you modified the quotation without following the rules in The Bedford Handbook to reveal your changes to a reader, insert a [ ] immediately after the quotation and type it exactly.

·         IF you used the author’s words for another purpose than he or she intended, strike through the quotation.

 

If You Are Really Puzzled Because You Have QP Marked

Students are usually puzzled about the QP marking because they lack some basic information. Here are the basics.

 

1.     The submission of a paper with words from an author without quotation marks can be the professor's evidence that you plagiarized. Some professors may not notice, but some may call it plagiarism. Do not assume that past responses by professors guarantees what future professors will want (and no boss ever will pay people—not well anyway—to copy words from one place to another).

2.     If you do this, some professors may label your work as “half-copy” plagiarism (term from The Bedford Handbook, page 692) if you:

·         Either copy an author’s phrases without quotation marks (“”)

·         Or use the author’s sentence structure and just swap a few words with what you think are synonyms

3.     Caution: If you think saying the name of the source means you can copy another’s words without quotations marks, look at this table. If you use a fact in the author’s words, citation is not enough; you must also use quotation marks.
What are the rules for citation and use of quotation marks? The rules vary depending upon whether you are writing:

·         A fact from the source in your own words

·         A fact in the author’s words (you are quoting):

 

What Kind of Fact Are You Using

Do You Need Citation (Page # etc.)?

Do You Need Quotation Marks (“”)?

A fact in your own words

Yes—although I do not require that in the Blackboard’s tiny box for essays

No

A fact in the author’s words

Yes

Yes <Notice this.

 

Specifics about this course:

·         I do not require citations when you use facts in an essay that you do in the Blackboard’s tiny box for essays, but there are conditions.

·         On the other hand, I do require quotation marks if you use the author’s words. In this course, you may not plagiarize or “half-copy” plagiarize. You may however quote, but you have to use the rules for quoting. If you want more tips, check the preventions link below. If you have questions, please ask.

 

If You Are Confused about What Words in the Author’s Textbook Require Quotation Marks in Your Writing

If you are confused about when to use quotation marks, these examples may help you.

What the Author Wrote

What Words You Want to Write

Do You Need Quotation Marks (“”)? and Why

the Mississippi River

the Mississippi River

No – Proper nouns belong to all of us.

the green, roaring river

the river

No – Common nouns belong to all of us.

the green, roaring Mississippi River

the roaring Mississippi River

Yes <Notice this. – These are the author’s unique string of words so you identify them as not your creation with “”:

Trade was harder because of the “roaring Mississippi River.”

 

roaring

Yes <Notice this. – This is the author’s labeling of a condition and it is easier to be clear by using the author’s word with “”.

The author explained that the “roaring” river made trade more difficult.

 

How Can You Prevent the Problems Identified by the Evidence Checklist?

Click here for a link showing how you can prevent each of the problems identified by the Evidence Checklist. – This is the only link on this webpage that takes you to another webpage. You can return here by clicking the Back arrow or you can open the link in a new window.

Basic Information and Specific Information for This Course

What is the Goal for Writing in This Course?Think about it as teaching some section of history to your smart cousin.

With something that people talk about in many ways, sometimes it helps to state what is not the goal. With writing in this course, you:

·         Are not summarizing or not paraphrasing the textbook.

·         Do not need to repeat every fact or word in the textbook.

·         Are not showing your personal writing style while stating your feelings or your opinions.

 

 

Instead, in this course, the goal of all writing assignments is for you to do activities that help you learn the history of our nation. One of the most powerful ways to learn something is to try to teach it. You will succeed in these assignments if you do these things:

·         If you read carefully and work to understand what happened and ask if you need help.

·         If you figure out what essential facts that you would teach your cousin.

·         If you figure how you could organize those facts as simply and as accurately as you can.

·         If you write in a common sense way as though you are teaching your cousin history that he or she needs to understand.

 

 

How Does Your Instructor Grade Your Writing?

Because the goal of writing is to help you learn our nation’s history and the priority is for you to be accurate, I grade your writing by comparing what you wrote side by side with the facts in the textbook. With essays submitted, I use a method that lets me quickly identify all of the submissions where the students wrote on the same question.

 

1.     I place side by side:

·         On the left, the textbook opened to the probable section or sections students should have used.

·         On the right, the submissions of students’ papers on that question.

2.     I use the Evidence Checklist and its 2-letter abbreviations for feedback (shown below) and grade each student’s submissions one by one.

3.     If there are multiple possible questions, I then repeat the steps above with the next question.

 

 

With the two essays for the Unit exams, I grade one of the questions using the method above. Unless I find problems such as factual errors in that essay, I grade the other one without the textbook side by side with your paper—a quicker method.

 

th the e

 

What Is the Evidence Checklist and What Are Its 2-Letter Abbreviations for Feedback?

I use the Evidence Checklist to grade on common standards (accepted rules or models) for academics and for jobs that depend on evidence:

·         The word evidence emphasizes that you must have proof for what you say—some fact from our approved source that anyone using that source can see for himself or herself.

·         The word checklist means a list of steps or things necessary for success (such as a pilot’s checklist for takeoff).

 

This is both a checklist (on the left) for success with evidence and a way to give feedback (on the right) about your use of evidence as a 2-letter abbreviation. Each checklist item:

·         Begins with an informal statement of a common standard that applies to academics and to jobs

·         Below that are our specific requirements, identified with the underlined phrase In this course.

 

Do each of the things on the checklist below or you may see the letters on the right as Feedback on your paper.

Feedback Letters

1.

For your source of facts, you use only sources your professor (or boss) accepts as reliable.



In this course, the only sources are the textbook chosen by the History Department and the sources provided at our Course Website. Do not use Internet websites, another textbook, or any other source—including your own memory.

NS = Fact is Not from an approved Source

2.

You must follow common standards to reveal to your reader who created the words and/or found the facts you are using in your writing. This is a requirement in courses and in some jobs.

 

 

In this course, you may:

·         Either write facts in your own words

·         Or you may use exact sentences or phrases from the textbook placed within quotation marks according to the specific rules for quotation marks (“”) to reveal ownership that are covered in The Bedford Handbook

·          

 

In this course, you may not copy an author’s phrases without quotation marks. You also may not replace a few words in an author’s sentence. Both are what The Bedford Handbook calls “half-copy” plagiarism (page 692).

QP = Quotation includes Plagiarized text

3.

You must follow common standards to reveal any changes you made to the author’s words. This may not be just a punctuation error. You may be misleading your reader about the evidence.



In this course, if you use another’s words, you must be sure either not to change them or—if you change them—to follow the specific rules in The Bedford Handbook to reveal those changes to the reader.

QC = Quotation is Changed from the source.

4.

You must use reliable sources to verify what you write—to confirm its accuracy.

 

 

In this course, if you cannot verify the fact, do not write it and do not assume that the source agrees with you. If you are certain something is true and you cannot find it clearly in our sources, ask me for help.


In this course, you also must select facts to reveal the facts accurately. Examples:

·         If a question is about something specific (such as a time, type of person, or region), verify that the source is about that specific thing.

·         If the source covers facts about two or more sides or positions, do not include only one side as though the other did not occur.

NT = Fact is Not True. It is not verifiable using the probable page in the source.

5.

With most written work for professors (or bosses), if asked, you must be able to state exactly where (a specific page) in the source that each fact came from—whether you wrote the words or the author did. With many college assignments, you must provide citations and use a specific standard (such as MLA, APA, or the Chicago Manual of Style).

 

In this course with most written assignments, you do not need to provide citations (the specific page number from our textbook) unless I cannot recognize where the fact came from.

If I cannot recognize where the fact came from, then you must show me the location on the page. It cannot be a vague statement: if a reasonable person using a reliable dictionary and reading the entire passage would not agree that you have evidence for what you say, then neither will I.

 

If you ask to do the more challenging alternative assignment instead of the essays for Unit 3, then you must cite according to the instructions.

W? = Where is the specific page where this is supported in our textbook?

 

 

Copyright C. J. Bibus, Ed.D. 2003-2013

 

 

WCJC Department:

History – Dr. Bibus

Contact Information:

281.239.1577 or bibusc@wcjc.edu

Last Updated:

2013

WCJC Home:

http://www.wcjc.edu/